Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and you may Individual Choices, 29(2), 119–126.
Cross-sectional study regarding intimacy, passions, and connection: Analysis the brand new assumptions of triangular principle off love
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The area regarding connection from inside the individual mating. Overview of Standard Therapy, 4(2), erotische dating app reviews 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A great. (2002). Internet sites contradiction reviewed. Record away from Public Factors, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites contradiction: A social tech you to decrease social engagement and you may mental well-becoming? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.M., & Fields, J. Meters. (2001). Number, timing, and you can lifetime of marriages and you may divorces. Most recent Society Profile, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Impact finest on performing even worse: Social reviews within close matchmaking. Diary out of Identification and Societal Psychology, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. Good., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Journal regarding Identification and you will Societal Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A great., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention in order to glamorous choices: Brand new developed therapy out-of relationship restoration. Progression and you may Individual Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential analysis out-of dispute and accord inside the troubled and you can nondistressed relationship couples. Log of Contacting and you will Medical Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. An effective., Green, A good. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Matchmaking formation on the web: What’s the larger appeal? Diary of Public Factors, 58(1), 9–30.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. Grams., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The key benefits of confident illusions: Idealization additionally the framework out of fulfillment when you look at the close dating. Record away from Identity and you will Personal Mindset, 70(1), 79–98.
Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-testing purposes for the close relationship: A style of global enhancement and you will specific confirmation. From inside the P. Noller & J. An excellent. Feeney (Eds.), Expertise ents regarding examination of partners telecommunications (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge School Drive.
Intrasexual vigilance: The brand new implicit knowledge out of personal rivalry
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the consumer-therapist bond from lens out-of connection theory. Psychotherapy: Principle, Look, Behavior, Training, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The latest public keeping track of program: Enhanced sensitivity to help you public cues given that a transformative a reaction to personal exclusion. Into the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The brand new societal outcast: Ostracism, social exemption, getting rejected, and you will intimidation (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Mindset Press.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Around the globe and particular relational patterns on contact with personal interactions. Journal out of Identification and Personal Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An excellent., Tran, S., ). Connection and you can guidance trying from inside the close dating. Identification and you may Societal Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and particular connection representations in the adulthood: Could there be a romance?. Log Out-of Personal And private Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. An effective. (2001)mitment and you may dating repairs systems. For the J. Harvey & An effective. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic intimate matchmaking: Repair and improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, Good. D. (2000). Projection physically effect certainly partners as a purpose of the similarity within shared knowledge. Identity And Societal Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Aftereffects of salience away from extrinsic rewards into preference and you will loving. Journal away from Personality and Public Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.