Participants
Four hundred and you will eighty-around three participants was indeed recruited off a huge college or university in the Hong-kong through advertisements released inside the university and you may places, mass characters courtesy divisions and attributes, and you will snowballing. Comparison happened inside the a lab. Users finished the sex salience level, the brand new combined-gender anxiety measure and claimed their group background. Every tips was indeed demonstrated within their fresh English vocabulary as English ‘s the medium of education to own tertiary studies within the Hong kong. This study try carried out in accordance into the advice and you may approval of one’s College or university from Hong kong People Look Integrity Committee (HKU HREC). All of the sufferers provided authored advised consent according to the Declaration off Helsinki. Adult concur wasn’t required by brand new HKU HREC for it shot.
School banding was averaged if participants had attended more than one high school (only 4.1% of the total sample). Participants also reported their college year, total parental income and parental education, numbers of sisters and brothers, faculty, and sexual orientation. Students’ faculty was coded as male-dominated, female-dominated, or gender-balanced based on enrolment statistics . Sexual orientation was assessed using the adapted Klein Sexual Orientation Grid (KSOG) . Participants rated their sexual orientation in the past 12 months on four aspects, namely attraction, behavior, fantasy, and identity, from 0 (other-sex only) to 6 (same-sex only). The number of participants was roughly balanced by school type and student gender. Participants who had switched between single-sex and coeducational schools were excluded from analysis (n = 27). The final sample consisted of 456 graduates (239 females; 52.4%) who had attended 182 different high schools. These graduates either attended single-sex schools (n = 207) or coeducational schools (n = 249) for high school education. This sample size had over 80% a priori power to detect small differences (.26 < d < .30) at ? = .05, two-tailed . The sample was almost exclusively Chinese (97.6%) and aged years on average. The mean parental income of the sample (HKD42632) suggested that the sample was demographically similar to undergraduate students from several local universities (e.g., [58–60]).
Table 6 presents detailed participant characteristics by school type and student gender. Consistent with prior research [3,4,8], participants from single-sex schools had parents with higher education level, t(454) = 3.48, p = .001, and attended more academically excellent schools, t(387) = 4.26, p < .001, unequal variances, than did participants from coeducational schools.
Table 6
b 1 = zero education/pre-first, 2 = top, 3 = junior second, cuatro = elder supplementary, 5 = post-secondary, 6 = postgraduate.
c 0 = almost every other gender just, 1 = most other sex primarily, dos = other intercourse considerably more, 3 = one another gender similarly, 4 = same intercourse somewhat more, 5 = exact same gender mostly, six = exact same intercourse simply.
d Details contained in this table was incorporated since the covariates in every analyses, apart from general public anxiety which had been included due to the fact a beneficial covariate just inside analyses involving blended-gender anxiety into the college or university shot.
Intercourse salience measure
Gender salience is measured by the exact same method included in Analysis step 1. The fresh new inter-rater reliability is perfect for most of the responses (? between .87 to .99).
Percentage of other-gender close friends scale
Portion of other-sex close friends is measured by the exact same method found in Study step 1. Percentage of other-gender family relations was not assessed about school sample.
Mixed-gender nervousness scale
Such as Studies 1, users claimed their mixed-gender anxiety towards altered dating adultspace Podpora stress measure (DAS-A) . In contrast to Study step one, people when you look at the Investigation 2 completed a full 21-product kind of DAS-A because dating experience is actually popular regarding school test (93.4% of your players stated a global dating experience; look for directory of matchmaking experience items in the Relationship History Questionnaire for the Desk D in the S1 File). Individuals who got never ever dated just before was indeed requested to visualize just how they might be and you will perform regarding revealed situations. For it full-scale, 10 points counted Fear of Negative Comparison, eight circumstances mentioned Public Distress in Matchmaking Situations, five products mentioned Public Stress into the Combined-intercourse Organizations, and five filler circumstances offered a break away from rating stress-associated things. The inner surface are ideal for overall DAS-A beneficial (? = .95), Concern with Bad Investigations (? = .92), Social Distress inside Matchmaking (? = .89), and you may Societal Distress inside Combined-sex Groups (? = .80). Due to the fact our very own notice was not merely on dating nervousness and just 2.6% of your university users advertised which have zero heterosexual appeal after all, i provided most of the professionals in the analysis of blended-gender nervousness and you can regulated getting intimate positioning.